Skip to content

branch-3.1: [enhancement](hudi)support native read hudi top level schema change table. #49051 #52462

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
morrySnow merged 3 commits into from
Jun 30, 2025
Merged

branch-3.1: [enhancement](hudi)support native read hudi top level schema change table. #49051 #52462

morrySnow merged 3 commits into from
Jun 30, 2025

Conversation

@hubgeter
Copy link
Contributor

@hubgeter hubgeter commented Jun 28, 2025

bp #49051

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #xxx

Related PR: #xxx

Problem Summary:

Release note

None

Check List (For Author)

  • Test

    • Regression test
    • Unit Test
    • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    • No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
      • This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
      • Previous test can cover this change.
      • No code files have been changed.
      • Other reason

  • Behavior changed:

    • No.
    • Yes.

  • Does this need documentation?

    • No.
    • Yes.

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

  • Confirm the release note
  • Confirm test cases
  • Confirm document
  • Add branch pick label

hubgeter added 2 commits June 29, 2025 00:46
@hubgeter
[enhancement](hudi)support native read hudi top level schema change t…
77f38b1 
…able. (apache#49051)

Similar to pr apache#48723
Problem Summary:

1. Supports native reader reading tables after the top-level schema of
hudi is changed, but does not support tables after the internal schema
of struct is changed.
change internal schema of struct schema(not support, will support in the
next PR).

2. Unify the logic of iceberg/paimon/hudi native reader to handle schema
change's table.
@hubgeter
fix build
3a782d9
@hubgeter hubgeter requested a review from morrySnow as a code owner June 28, 2025 17:08
@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

hello-stephen commented Jun 28, 2025

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@hubgeter
Copy link
Contributor Author

hubgeter commented Jun 28, 2025

run buildall

@doris-robot
Copy link

doris-robot commented Jun 28, 2025

Cloud UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 🎉

Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

Category Coverage
Function Coverage 82.87% (1142/1378)
Line Coverage 66.95% (20317/30347)
Region Coverage 66.15% (10000/15118)
Branch Coverage 55.93% (5288/9454)

@hubgeter
Copy link
Contributor Author

hubgeter commented Jun 28, 2025

run buildall

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

hello-stephen commented Jun 28, 2025

Cloud UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 🎉

Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

Category Coverage
Function Coverage 82.87% (1142/1378)
Line Coverage 66.97% (20323/30347)
Region Coverage 66.17% (10004/15118)
Branch Coverage 55.94% (5289/9454)

@morrySnow morrySnow changed the title [enhancement](hudi)support native read hudi top level schema change table. (#49051) branch-3.1: [enhancement](hudi)support native read hudi top level schema change table. #49051 Jun 30, 2025
@morrySnow morrySnow merged commit 2f9b359 into apache:branch-3.1 Jun 30, 2025
18 of 21 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@morrySnow morrySnow morrySnow approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@hubgeter @hello-stephen @doris-robot @morrySnow